24-0225p - Detailed Summary

The audience is welcomed, including those present in person and those listening via phone, with hopes that the session will be edifying.

The speaker mentions the familiarity of the topic to many in the audience and relates it to a radio call-in show from Mansfield, Ohio, where biblical questions or comments are discussed.

Highlights a caller’s statement about doing what is "appropriate," prompting a deeper exploration into the meaning of the word.

The speaker reflects on the word "appropriate" after a call, pondering to whom actions should be appropriate.

He describes looking up the definition of "appropriate," noting a humorous mistake in spelling during his search.

The speaker discusses the dictionary definitions of "appropriate," mentioning both a physical dictionary and Webster’s online version for cross-reference.

Explains that taking something for one’s own use can be legitimate, like purchasing an item at a store.

Discusses how Christ bought the church with His blood, emphasizing the purpose of the church to offer praise to God as per 1 Peter 2:9.

Continues with the theme of Christ’s purchase of the church, focusing on the communion and purpose of praise to God.

Introduces the negative aspect of taking something for one’s own use without permission, likening it to theft.

Uses examples like shoplifting and car theft to illustrate inappropriate taking.

The speaker admits uncertainty about the exact topic that prompted the caller’s comment on doing what is appropriate.

The discussion shifts to the Lord’s Supper, with an emphasis on the host’s response regarding the elements used in the Supper.

The speaker explains the necessity of unleavened bread during the Lord’s Supper, contrasting it with other preferable tastes but inappropriate for the context.

Details the communion pack containing unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine, symbolizing but not literally being Christ’s blood.

Clarifies that the elements do not transform into actual blood but serve as symbolic representations.

Warns about the misuse of the term 'appropriate' in the context of the Lord’s Supper, where unauthorized elements or practices could be introduced.

Discusses the biblical practice of observing the Lord’s Supper on the first day of the week, not sporadically or on other days.

Draws parallels between the Sabbath for the Israelites and the first day of the week for Christians, emphasizing the day of Christ’s resurrection.

Reiterates the importance of the first day of the week due to its association with Christ’s resurrection and the establishment of the church.

Mentions the scriptural directive for collections to be made on the first day of the week as per 1 Corinthians 16.

Highlights Paul’s instructions to the Corinthians and Galatia churches about setting aside contributions on the first day of the week.

Comments on the current practice of collection, noting that it should ideally occur on the first day of the week.

References 1 Corinthians 11 where Paul criticizes the Corinthians for not observing the Lord’s Supper in a worthy manner.

Discusses the communal aspect of the Lord’s Supper, noting it’s a sharing both with Christ and among the members.

Explains that the act of taking the Supper involves communion with Christ and fellow believers.

Critiques the mixing of the Lord’s Supper with a common meal, advocating for a distinct and respectful observance.

Outlines how the Corinthians were instructed to wait for one another and take the Supper together.

Concludes with the final definition of "appropriate," focusing on setting aside practices for their intended sacred use.

Reinforces the specific purpose of the Lord’s Supper as communion with Christ and unity among believers.

The speaker recites the words of institution for the Lord’s Supper from 1 Corinthians 11, emphasizing remembrance of Christ and the proclamation of His death.

Warns about partaking in an unworthy manner, advising self-examination before participation.

Describes communion as a time for personal examination and collective sharing among believers.

Stresses the communal aspect of the Lord’s Supper, where believers should wait for each other to partake together.

Highlights the act of remembrance during the Lord’s Supper, following Christ’s command to remember Him.

Discusses the potential misinterpretation of "appropriate," suggesting that what might be appropriate to individuals might not align with God’s will.

Explores the distinction between what one might personally desire as appropriate versus what is divinely intended.

Advocates for using elements and practices of worship as intended by the Lord, particularly focusing on the Lord’s Supper.

Refers to 1 Corinthians 14, emphasizing that worship should be done in decency, order, spirit, and truth.

Encourages those listening to become Christians if they have not, by believing and being baptized for salvation.

Stresses the importance of living faithfully post-baptism.

Urges those who have strayed from faith to return, offering prayer for restoration.

Invites any with personal issues or needs to come forward for prayer and support from the church.

Concludes by reinforcing the idea of doing what is fitting and proper in God’s sight, inviting action while the congregation stands and sings.